PLM President Gives Insight on Current Auto Market
The first half of the year is behind us and our results are mixed depending upon the angle from which you view them. From a premium production standpoint, we are having a banner year with premium surging well above our expectations. This premium production windfall is driven by a record number of customers choosing to renew their coverages with PLM. Our retention of business upon renewal has jumped past 90 percent, the highest I have seen it in my almost 20 years at PLM, perhaps even the highest I have seen it in my 42 years in the insurance business. To think that more than 90 percent of our insureds had the faith and confidence in the Pennsylvania Lumbermens team to renew their coverages with us this year is simply incredible. Be assured that we will not rest on our laurels. We start each day with the thought, what can we do to improve upon the value of an insured’s relationship with PLM?
Just as importantly, we have enhanced our ability to reach out and bring in new customers. We are having an exceptional year from a new business standpoint, as we’ve proved to many new clients that PLM is the company in which they should place their faith and confidence! We are indeed appreciative and thankful.
GOOD NEWS, BAD NEWS
Surging lumber prices have caused many of our insureds to re-evaluate the level of coverage that they carry on their inventory. We are receiving a record number of requests to increase insureds’ stock coverage as a result. The truth is that just about all of our insureds should be reacting to surging lumber prices and requesting us to increase their coverage on stock. I think many would find themselves underinsured should a loss occur if they have not adjusted their coverage values accordingly. At the same time, working hand-in-hand with many of our insureds, our Business Development Representatives (BDRs) and Loss Control Representatives are reviewing insureds’ building coverage limits and are finding many with inadequate coverage as a result. We are running “core logic” valuations to assist both insureds and PLM in determining adequate building values. This strategic initiative has added additional premium to PLM.
From a profitability standpoint, the news is not as positive. A horrible January underwriting loss driven by bad weather (where we had to tap into our CAT reinsurance program), an abnormally large number of fires, as well as a number of costly auto and general liability losses conspired to create a hole in our profitability that we have been attempting to fill ever since. Interestingly, we have had multi-million dollar fires in every segment of our business with retail wholesalers, light manufacturers, and heavy manufacturers negatively impacted. This is indeed unusual. Our policyholder surplus has taken a hit as a result, but still remains extremely strong and is a reflection of our conservatively managed balance sheet.
CONCERNS CONTINUE FOR COMMERCIAL AUTO
I would like to take a moment to further discuss with you two issues. First, an issue that affects everyone, whether they insure their commercial auto exposures with PLM or another company in the industry. I have had the opportunity to talk to many of my peers at a variety of industry meetings and have yet to find one who is not concerned about and taking remedial action to improve loss experience in the commercial auto line. Inexperienced drivers, overcrowded roads, distracted driving, increased frequency of delivery, road construction, complex technologies in vehicles, soaring medical costs, as well as repair costs are producing biting commercial auto loss results, for not only PLM, but the insurance industry as a whole.
We have reacted by dramatically tightening our underwriting standards and enhancing loss control assistance that is available to our insureds. We’ve also attempted to rework claim processes to better control claims costs and we’ve raised rates accordingly. Yet, loss frequency and severity on the auto line has surged, and there is no sign of abatement.
So, what can you do? The first step to addressing this issue is to understand that this problem will require your attention and involvement. Driver selection and training needs to be improved. More than 75 percent of our new losses this year have been caused by “driver error”. Equipment maintenance needs to be prioritized and enhanced. A recent example of this is a large claim we received involving a rear-end collision due to the rubber being excessively worn on the brake pedal. The driver’s foot slipped off the brake pedal as traffic was coming to a stop.
Loading and unloading activities also need to be evaluated, reworked and enforced, and if needed, supervised more carefully. Load securement procedures need to be followed and evaluated. Drivers should have the authority to not leave the yard if they believe the load has been improperly built and secured.
We have partnered with companies like Samba Safety and Drivers Alert to provide valuable resources to our insureds. Simply signing up for these services is not enough. You have to be committed to using them! You need to discuss these with our BDRs and Loss Control Representatives, sign up for them, and then use the information that they generate to manage your fleet exposure. Our BDRs and Loss Control Reps along with our entire underwriting staff are willing to work with you to enhance your risk management capabilities in the auto arena.
I would caution that even healthy accounts that are enjoying profitability and are adhering to and employing many of the programs outlined above will potentially see rate increases going forward. We, like many other carriers, are working on this problem from every angle, but the reality is pricing increases will be involved in returning this area to profitability whether you are insured with PLM or any of our competitors.
How bad is it? Well, think about this. If we were to eliminate those losses where our insureds’ drivers were operating heavy vehicles under the influence of a drug or alcohol, our loss ratio would improve significantly. What that means is that every day many of our insureds’ drivers are on the road when they shouldn’t be. Before you say ‘not at my yard’, think again!
I would encourage you to recognize this issue as the crisis it is becoming. Even if you are enjoying profitability, if you are not spending a substantial amount of your time (and making a substantial investment) working on improving your business in the areas outlined above, you or your fleet manager need to reconsider what you are doing and what you could be doing better. PLM’s talented loss control team is ready, willing and able to assist you in this endeavor. And, to be quite frank, even if your autos are not insured by PLM, I think you would find a welcoming ear from your current carrier if you would open a conversation with them about this issue.
A LOOK AT SAWMILL, PALLET AND HEAVY MANUFACTURING LOSSES
The second area I would like to focus on is the spiraling losses that have once again emerged in the sawmill, pallet, and heavy manufacturing arena. While PLM has avoided most of them, the fact is that pallet, sawmills and other heavy wood manufacturing businesses are burning down with a frequency that I cannot recall in my tenure with PLM. With values enhanced due to automation in many of these accounts, the size of loss that the insurance industry is absorbing from this class of business is at record levels.
When the severity of losses increases and the frequency of severe losses increases with it, it doesn’t take long for the insurance industry to react. We recently had an underwriter from a large international reinsurer in our office discussing this very topic. His position and that of the reinsurance marketplace in general is that there are two troubled lines in the industry today – transportation (auto as outlined above) and lumber. I was shocked that an organization as significant and deep as this reinsurer, that offers so many broad-based solutions to so many classes of business, would recognize the problems of a relatively small niche when you consider the worldwide insurance marketplace.
To underscore this, I recently received a brief from a large German reinsurer written by a technician in Cologne, Germany who was bemoaning the losses being generated by European sawmills. To be honest, he painted a picture that was fairly bleak.
In the last 10 months a major carrier has withdrawn from the niche that will eventually drop 200 sizeable mills into the marketplace. In the Midwest, a major player is non-renewing pallet shops. Another company in the Pacific Northwest is not renewing certain property associated with wood risks and one in New England is non-renewing any frame unprotected mills.
My point here is this: There are fewer and fewer companies that are willing to entertain primary manufacturing risks. Prices are increasing and reinsurance could become scarce. Meanwhile, PLM continues to offer a market to insureds that meet our underwriting standards. Primary manufacturing owners need to be aware that an impending crisis could be in the offing in this segment of the niche if large losses don’t settle down. In response, insurance companies could employ stricter underwriting guidelines, more demanding terms and conditions and substantially increased pricing. For business owners, the solution here is to take the steps now in your business to avoid, control and reduce your loss exposures. Once again, we stand ready, willing and able to work with you.
On that note, I hope the remainder of your summer is as enjoyable for you, your colleagues and your families.
Courtesy of Posted PLM